Save the Deveron Valley
Battery Storage and Associated Infrastructure
Community questions before consent.
A plain-English checklist for testing whether a large battery proposal is properly described, sited and safeguarded.
Residents, community groups, land users and decision-makers reviewing a BESS proposal.
Ask who remains responsible if the project changes owner or closes.
Battery Energy Storage Systems can help balance electricity supply and support a changing energy system. But needed somewhere does not mean suitable everywhere.
This guide does not assume every BESS is unsafe or unacceptable. It asks whether a particular proposal is appropriately sited, fully described, independently assessed and backed by enforceable safeguards.
Twelve questions to ask first
- What is the full project, including every associated and off-site work?
- Who owns, operates and maintains it?
- Why was this site chosen and what alternatives were rejected?
- What other development does it depend on, enable or make easier?
- Who lives, works or depends on water nearby?
- What is the site-specific fire and emergency strategy?
- What will firefighters be expected to do?
- Where will firefighting water come from and where will contaminated water go?
- What will the whole site sound like at night?
- Can construction and emergency vehicles reach it safely in real rural conditions?
- What happens at the end of the operating life?
- What financial protection remains if the operator fails or the asset is sold?
Start with identity and responsibility
1. Who is behind the project?
Ask for the applicant, landowner, asset owner, operator, maintenance contractor, parent company, funder, planning route, grid connection, capacity in MW, storage duration in MWh, battery chemistry, operating life and permanent 24-hour emergency contact.
A change of company name, owner or operator should never make public accountability disappear.
2. What exactly is proposed?
Ask for one coordinated maximum-design plan showing battery units, chemistry, transformers, inverters, switchgear, substations, control buildings, roads, compounds, drainage, water storage, firewater containment, fencing, lighting, security, landscaping, grid connection, temporary works and off-site works.
Fundamental matters should not be hidden behind “details to follow after consent”.
3. Why this location?
Ask what function the BESS performs, why the capacity and duration are needed, what search area was used, which alternatives were assessed, whether brownfield or less sensitive land was considered and which harms were avoided through site selection rather than promised mitigation.
A credible alternatives assessment explains criteria, sites considered, reasons for rejection and environmental trade-offs.
Safety and effects beyond the fence
4. Fire and emergency planning
Ask for a public site-specific Battery Safety Management Statement and outline Emergency Response Plan. They should cover battery chemistry, testing, detection, monitoring, shutdown, ventilation, gas release, separation, fire spread, explosion risk, wildfire, lightning, technical support, responder access, unstaffed monitoring, prolonged incidents and neighbour notification.
Ask whether the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service has received the actual design information and whether unresolved concerns remain. A statement that “the fire service will deal with it” is not an emergency plan.
5. Firefighting water and contamination
Ask what firefighting strategy is assumed, how much water is required, where it comes from, whether it remains available in drought or freezing conditions, what contaminated volume may be produced, how drains are isolated, what containment exists and how polluted water will be tested and removed.
Firewater is not ordinary surface-water runoff. The design must explain what happens if rainfall and an incident occur together or the intended containment is exceeded.
6. Flooding, drainage and private supplies
Map rivers, burns, drains, culverts, groundwater, wetlands, springs, wells, boreholes and private water supplies. Ask whether hardstanding changes runoff, foundations alter groundwater and drainage can be isolated during power failure or emergency.
Require baseline and follow-up protection for nearby private supplies.
7. Noise and vibration
Ask for background measurements during quiet night-time periods and modelling of the whole site at maximum credible operation: cooling, inverters, transformers and substations together.
Ask about tonal, low-frequency and intermittent characteristics, open-window conditions, cumulative development, enforceable limits, post-commissioning monitoring and corrective action after complaints.
8. Roads and emergency access
Ask for the complete construction and emergency routes, vehicle numbers, abnormal-load details, bridge and culvert checks, winter and flooding resilience, school and farm movements, turning space and an alternative route if the main access is blocked.
9. Landscape, lighting and security
Ask whether the site was selected to minimise visibility or whether screening is being used to rescue a poor location. Require representative viewpoints, winter and summer views, night-time visualisations, cumulative infrastructure and realistic year-one planting.
Check whether fencing, lighting, CCTV, acoustic walls or vegetation create new impacts or conflict with fire access, surveillance and wildfire control.
10. Land, ecology and historic landscape
Ask how soil, drainage, agriculture, habitat links, lighting, species and restoration shaped the site—not merely how impacts will be mitigated later. Include access tracks, cable trenches, compounds and other ground disturbance.
Check designated and undesignated heritage, old routes, field systems, local names, settings and chance-find procedures.
The connected project and long-term accountability
11. Associated infrastructure and cumulative effects
Ask whether the BESS depends on or enables a substation, overhead line, underground cable, access road, renewable generation, another battery phase, private wire, generator, industrial development or future high-demand use.
Ask which parts are in this application, which are separate, which are foreseeable, what maximum scenario is realistic and who assesses the combined landscape, traffic, noise, water, ecology, emergency and community effects.
Do not claim a future use without evidence. Do insist that foreseeable connected development is not hidden by separate applications.
For the campaign's wider framework, see the Full Impact Ledger, Community Shadow EIA and Strategic Dependency Watch.
12. Ownership, insurance and complaints
Ask who owns and operates the asset, whether the applicant is a special-purpose company, what parent guarantee and insurance exist, who pays uninsured losses, how obligations transfer after a sale, where maintenance records are kept and who can require corrective action.
Separate enforceable conditions from voluntary promises.
13. Decommissioning and financial security
Ask what happens to batteries, transformers, foundations, cabling, hardstanding, fencing, drainage and contaminated land. Require a reviewed, index-linked financial guarantee capable of surviving insolvency and ownership change.
The amount should cover removal, waste handling, restoration, aftercare, monitoring and professional costs. The public should not inherit a failed industrial site.
What good evidence looks like
Strong information is site-specific, dated, mapped, quantified, written in plain language, prepared by named competent people, based on the final or maximum design, independently checked where needed, enforceable, funded and reviewed over the project life.
Answers need more work when they rely mainly on phrases such as “details will follow”, “standard mitigation”, “all regulations will be followed”, “the fire service will deal with it”, “landscaping will screen it”, “the final equipment is not selected” or “other projects are outside this application”.
Evidence labels
- Verified fact: confirmed by a primary or reliable official source.
- Reported local concern: a resident's account requiring checking or corroboration.
- Pattern evidence: another project showing a possible issue or solution, not proof of what will happen here.
- Question for authorities: a material point that remains unanswered.
A low-carbon label does not remove the need for good siting, competent design, transparent evidence, enforceable safeguards and public accountability.
What this guide does not say
- that every BESS is unsafe or should be refused;
- that one separation distance fits every design;
- that another incident proves what will happen here;
- that planning replaces the duties of SFRS, SEPA or HSE;
- that monitoring can replace prevention.
Official sources
- Scottish Government: Battery Energy Storage Systems planning guidance, 19 March 2026
- National Fire Chiefs Council: grid-scale energy-storage planning guidance
- Scottish Fire and Rescue Service: Battery Energy Storage Systems
- SEPA: Battery Energy Storage Systems
- Health and Safety Executive: Battery Energy Storage Systems
Checked against the public sources above on 11 July 2026. Thresholds, guidance and project routes can change; re-check before publication or formal reliance.