Save the Deveron Valley
Archaeology and Historic Landscape
A community guide to noticing, recording and protecting what maps may miss.
A guide to designated and undesignated heritage, local knowledge, setting and safe reporting.
Residents, farmers, local historians and people contributing evidence to development processes.
Privately record one old name, route, building, boundary or story that a desk study might miss.
The Deveron Valley is a historic as well as ecological and working landscape. Its history survives in roads, bridges, farms, field systems, mills, wells, ruins, place names, cropmarks, buried deposits and memory.
This page is public information, not archaeological or legal advice. Do not trespass or investigate by excavation.
Twelve questions to ask first
- What historic and archaeological records were searched?
- Was the full project footprint assessed?
- Were access roads, cables, drainage, compounds and temporary works included?
- Were old maps, aerial images, place names and local accounts considered?
- Was the land inspected by appropriately qualified people?
- Were undesignated as well as protected places included?
- Were setting, views and relationships assessed?
- Were alternatives considered before mitigation?
- Could construction disturb unrecorded buried remains?
- Is fieldwork required before the design is fixed?
- Is there a clear chance-find procedure?
- How will findings be preserved, archived and shared?
1. More than designated monuments
Assessment should include scheduled monuments and listed buildings, but also undesignated sites, locally important structures, historic roads, field systems, settlement remains, industrial and agricultural features, landscape character, views and community memory.
A place does not become historically unimportant because it has never been formally designated.
2. Search the records—and understand their limits
Useful starting points include the Aberdeenshire Historic Environment Record, Historic Environment Scotland Portal, PastMap, historic Ordnance Survey maps, estate plans and aerial photography.
Ask whether the developer obtained professional HER information from the Archaeology Service rather than relying only on the public map.
3. What local knowledge may reveal
Former farm and field names, drove roads, fords, previous bridges, mills, lades, wells, ruined buildings, removed walls, repeated finds, unusual mounds, wartime features and family memory can all trigger useful questions.
Separate what a person saw directly from what was heard or remembered.
4. Place names as clues
Names can preserve evidence of land use, water, routes, settlement, industry, ownership and worship. A name is not proof of a site, but it may justify further research.
Keep the source: old map, deed, directory, publication or oral account.
5. Roads, bridges, farms and fields
Look for hollow ways, drove roads, estate tracks, former railway alignments, fords, bridge approaches, milestones, culverts, steadings, cottages, kilns, mills, rig-and-furrow, banks, dykes, hedges and estate planting.
A modern open field may still contain shallow foundations or earlier cultivation patterns.
6. Setting, views and relationships
Heritage harm is not limited to physical destruction. Consider landform, skyline, river valleys, approach routes, darkness, tranquillity, designed planting, historic ownership and visual relationships between places.
Ask whether winter views, cumulative infrastructure, overhead lines, substations, lighting and access works were assessed together.
7. Assess the whole footprint
Include compounds, parking, soil storage, crane pads, haul roads, temporary bridges, road widening, drainage ponds, cable trenches, pylon foundations, substations, fencing, borrow pits and off-site mitigation.
Temporary works can permanently remove archaeological evidence.
8. Investigation before design hardens
Depending on risk, work may include documentary research, map regression, walkover, geophysics, fieldwalking, trial trenches, building recording, setting assessment and community engagement.
Ask whether the Council Archaeology Service agreed the scope and whether post-consent work could still lead to meaningful redesign.
9. Avoidance before recording loss
The preferred order is to understand, avoid, reduce harm, preserve significant remains where appropriate, and record only where loss cannot reasonably be avoided.
“Preservation by record” should not become the first answer to a site or route that could still be changed.
10. Safe community recording
From a safe lawful position, take a wide context photograph, a medium view and a closer image without touching the feature. Record date, direction, approximate size, land use and whether it appears on a map.
Do not climb, scrape, clean, lift or rearrange stones or structures.
11. Objects, hoards and human remains
Potentially significant portable archaeological finds in Scotland must be reported through Treasure Trove. Record the findspot, do not clean the object and keep items and locations labelled.
If objects remain together in the ground, leave them in place and contact Treasure Trove or the Council archaeologist promptly. Possible human remains must be left untouched and reported to Police Scotland.
12. Chance finds during construction
A written procedure should state who stops work, secures the area, contacts the archaeologist, records the find, handles human remains, reports Treasure Trove material and decides when work can restart.
It should apply to all contractors, and significant discoveries must be capable of triggering redesign.
Three-sentence evidence format
Evidence labels
- Verified fact: confirmed through a primary or reliable official source.
- Reported local concern: a resident's account or recollection not yet independently confirmed.
- Pattern evidence: an example elsewhere showing a possible issue or assessment method.
- Question for authorities: a material heritage point that remains unanswered.
Historic places should be understood before decisions harden—and local knowledge may reveal what a desk-based assessment has not yet seen.
What this guide does not say
- that every mound or old name proves archaeology;
- that every feature prevents development;
- that all heritage is nationally protected;
- that residents should investigate by digging;
- that a blank database search proves nothing exists;
- that recording automatically makes destruction acceptable.
Official research and reporting links
- Aberdeenshire Historic Environment Record
- Aberdeenshire Council Archaeology Service
- Aberdeenshire Council: reporting archaeology finds
- Historic Environment Scotland Portal
- PastMap
- Treasure Trove Scotland: information for finders
Checked against the public sources above on 11 July 2026. Designations, records and reporting arrangements can change; confirm current information before formal reliance.