1. Full map before decisions harden
All connected infrastructure should be disclosed clearly: hub, OHLs, landfall, cables, substations, compounds, access roads, BESS, private wire and related demand.
A living landscape should not be asked to carry national infrastructure without full truth, fair share and lasting local benefit.
This draft charter takes inspiration from Shetland and Aberdeenshire while asking what a fair, joined-up and community-supported transition should look like for the Deveron Valley.
This is not “not in our backyard”.
It is: stop treating everyone’s backyard as spare land.
The Deveron Valley Fair Development Charter is a draft community framework for asking what a fair, climate-literate and place-respecting energy transition should look like here.
Major infrastructure should not be delivered through fragmented, developer-led processes that leave communities trying to reconstruct the full picture after decisions have already hardened.
We are looking beyond one valley. Similar pressures are being felt across Scotland, the Islands, Wales, Northern Ireland and northern England. The answer is not to move the burden from one community to another. The answer is better, joined-up, future-fit decision-making.
Shetland Islands Council approved a Shetland Development Charter in July 2026, setting expectations around fair and collaborative development, local voice, joined-up thinking, environmental protection, legacy, community benefit, ownership, housing and community wealth building.
Aberdeenshire Council has also launched an Energy Development Charter to guide large-scale energy developers on how projects can increase positive impacts for communities and local economies.
Save the Deveron Valley is asking how these principles are being applied to the Deveron Valley and to connected infrastructure affecting Aberdeenshire, Moray and wider north-east communities.
All connected infrastructure should be disclosed clearly: hub, OHLs, landfall, cables, substations, compounds, access roads, BESS, private wire and related demand.
Local evidence should shape the comparison of sites, not be reduced to mitigation once preference has hardened.
Communities experience roads, water, wildlife, farms, noise, landscape and stress as one lived reality, not separate technical files.
Every major project should answer: who owns, who profits, who carries risk, who loses land, who gains capacity, and what benefit is secured locally?
Communities should be offered serious routes to local energy ownership, bill support, resilience, heat, power and community wealth where lawful and viable.
Water, soils, woodland, wildlife, river restoration, dark skies, quiet roads and landscape character should be treated as assets, not obstacles.
No community should be reduced to land parcels. Property blight, displacement, tenancy, succession, farm viability and rural business continuity must be addressed.
Communities need independent planning, legal, technical, wellbeing, land and farm advice. Developer liaison is not the same as independent care.
Developers should publish local delivery plans for jobs, procurement, housing, training, community benefit, monitoring, reporting and enforceability.
Commitments should be tracked, published, reviewed and enforceable over the lifetime of the project, not announced and forgotten.
A fuller draft charter will be prepared as a free download.